Илим жана Технология

HOW TO LAND ON THE MOON - Smarter Every Day 250

Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days www.audible.com/smarter or TXT smarter to 500500
Click here if you're interested in subscribing: bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GET SMARTER SECTION
A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
www.aletro.org/
Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
www.apolloinrealtime.org/
I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
A special thank you to steveslater1987 for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tweet Ideas to me at:
smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
SmarterEveryDay
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
www.reddit.com/r/smartereveryday
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
www.ashellinthepit.com/
ashellinthepit.bandcamp.com/
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Warm Regards,
Destin

Жорумдар 

  1. SmarterEveryDay

    SmarterEveryDay

    26 күн мурун

    We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at www.patreon.com/smartereveryday . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

    • Almaadin

      Almaadin

      16 саат мурун

      @MaGaO true, but the software to land reliably is fairly new and getting better all the time. Most of the failed Mars landings happened without the benefit of the sensors and algorithms available now. It's still best to train the pilots of course.

    • MaGaO

      MaGaO

      Күн мурун

      @Almaadin Many Mars probes have crashed. If humans are aboard, it makes sense to train them just in case.

    • hernan jimenez

      hernan jimenez

      Күн мурун

      @Almaadin that was done on earth..so gullible lol. Mars supposedly is 1% density of earth atmosphere. which means no air. an you need air to slow parachute and need air for lift when they eventually fly helicopter drone. so the impossible without air debunks your Mars landing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭😭

    • Almaadin

      Almaadin

      Күн мурун

      I disagree with your thesis statement. After watching perseverance land itself, I think we could definitely automate landing on the moon. It is probably still a good idea to train astronauts to land on the moon but I don't think we HAVE to.

    • That Scar

      That Scar

      2 күн мурун

      Where is the helicopter video? No links?

  2. Florian Walter

    Florian Walter

    54 мүнөт мурун

    Why not installing a helium baloon, that lifts 5/6 of the lander's weight?

  3. Super Song

    Super Song

    Саат мурун

    at this point this man knows too much to be safe 🙏😂

  4. Ryan Rich

    Ryan Rich

    Саат мурун

    Where is the loud roar of the rocket when you hear them calmly talking as lunar is landing?

  5. Hirvieläin

    Hirvieläin

    3 саат мурун

    I would assume the lander's computer will perform the descent and landing in Artemis program.

  6. Suphakrit Phantharat

    Suphakrit Phantharat

    6 саат мурун

    Why do we need manual landing when we sent multiple rovers to mars and it has ability to auto land with high precision

  7. Bogdan Bogdan

    Bogdan Bogdan

    6 саат мурун

    15:55 oh my ghaad

  8. Bread Spreader

    Bread Spreader

    8 саат мурун

    1:45 kinda sus....

  9. Patar

    Patar

    8 саат мурун

    They actually planned on hitting the moon harder, the crunch pistons on the legs didn't get crunched all the way, that's why their steps are more awkward than usual, edit, because the ladder was hooked on the leg

  10. Rooster Original

    Rooster Original

    8 саат мурун

    Hahaha cant wait til you debunk it by looking into it :)

  11. britshell

    britshell

    8 саат мурун

    How? miniatures and a sound stage...

  12. mikenco

    mikenco

    9 саат мурун

    That was fascinating! Very few people are qualified to call Neil Armstrong an idiot! lol

  13. The Internet

    The Internet

    10 саат мурун

    I think what you're saying, that we need to learn about *why* decisions were made, is really the root of the "teach a man to fish" adage, and it's such a huge issue with the way I see things being taught. Don't give people the answer, give people the tools to find the answer.

  14. Phineas G

    Phineas G

    11 саат мурун

    Folks at NASA are probably taking notes rn.

  15. Black Panther

    Black Panther

    11 саат мурун

    Why does the velocity have to be zero upon landing? Why not near zero?

  16. Lavalambtron

    Lavalambtron

    12 саат мурун

    You're making it too easy for tomorrow's kids, they will look like geniuses but instead it was all on youtube.

  17. Laura White

    Laura White

    16 саат мурун

    never went to the moon brah. hash tag moon landing hoax

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      14 саат мурун

      @Laura White I have better things to do than watch conspiracy videos. That said, I never came across a good hoaxer argument.

    • Laura White

      Laura White

      14 саат мурун

      Atlas gee what a convincing retort Atlas. See “American Moon” on YT and then try to tell me it’s not possible that something’s up with the official narrative.

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      14 саат мурун

      wrong

  18. David Madsen

    David Madsen

    17 саат мурун

    You are truly a treasure! I so appreciate all of your videos, they are some of the most wholesome and informative media out there.

  19. Ian Thornton

    Ian Thornton

    20 саат мурун

    1:58

  20. Asophos

    Asophos

    23 саат мурун

    1:58 amongus

  21. Wyrylka

    Wyrylka

    23 саат мурун

    1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

  22. Aidan Gavin

    Aidan Gavin

    Күн мурун

    1:45

  23. Konnies Egg

    Konnies Egg

    Күн мурун

    Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

  24. goutvols103

    goutvols103

    Күн мурун

    Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

  25. Carl Carter

    Carl Carter

    Күн мурун

    I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

  26. The Obsolete Man

    The Obsolete Man

    Күн мурун

    There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

  27. Traci Wagnon

    Traci Wagnon

    Күн мурун

    U said among us a lot

  28. lungotevere

    lungotevere

    Күн мурун

    Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

  29. Tampa Blush

    Tampa Blush

    Күн мурун

    1:59 among us

  30. Tampa Blush

    Tampa Blush

    Күн мурун

    1:45 amongus

  31. Jeremy Hopkins

    Jeremy Hopkins

    Күн мурун

    1:45

  32. Bradyn Austin

    Bradyn Austin

    Күн мурун

    Boots on the moon.

  33. JPazer

    JPazer

    Күн мурун

    1:45 , 1:59

  34. JPazer

    JPazer

    Күн мурун

    1:45

  35. Derrick Fyffe

    Derrick Fyffe

    Күн мурун

    Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      21 саат мурун

      The delay is because of the finite speed of light. There's nothing that can be done about that.

  36. Chinmoy Kathar

    Chinmoy Kathar

    Күн мурун

    Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

  37. Travis Weide

    Travis Weide

    Күн мурун

    I WANNA SEE THIS CARTOON! MAKE IT HAPEN!

  38. Peter Hoare

    Peter Hoare

    Күн мурун

    What a brilliant video. Thank you.

  39. Sadrho Gollsodia

    Sadrho Gollsodia

    Күн мурун

    I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

  40. Mac Kettner

    Mac Kettner

    Күн мурун

    Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

  41. curtusw

    curtusw

    Күн мурун

    Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

  42. JustJoe Oleson

    JustJoe Oleson

    Күн мурун

    Thanks, dude.

  43. D. Skučas

    D. Skučas

    Күн мурун

    1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      Күн мурун

      spooky

  44. Dick Riggles

    Dick Riggles

    2 күн мурун

    Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

    • Brad Wooldidge

      Brad Wooldidge

      Күн мурун

      Ha! You’re an ignorant moron. You know NOTHING about the engineering involved.

    • Kyle Laurent

      Kyle Laurent

      Күн мурун

      Hate to break it to you but you are an idiot.

    • Dick Riggles

      Dick Riggles

      Күн мурун

      @Atlas Seriously, do some thinking and use logic...

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      Күн мурун

      Wrong.

  45. Bastian Nyström

    Bastian Nyström

    2 күн мурун

    Man I'm excited for this series!

  46. W Bix

    W Bix

    2 күн мурун

    tgagyg

  47. Nate Shanks

    Nate Shanks

    2 күн мурун

    This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

  48. Patrick Rudolph

    Patrick Rudolph

    2 күн мурун

    I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

  49. DeltaBravo

    DeltaBravo

    2 күн мурун

    1:58

  50. TP Productions

    TP Productions

    2 күн мурун

    WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON .. OR SPACE AT ALL. GOD IS REAL AND THE EARTH IS FLAT.

    • Brad Wooldidge

      Brad Wooldidge

      Күн мурун

      Troll.

    • Skippy

      Skippy

      Күн мурун

      fool spotted

    • Kyle Laurent

      Kyle Laurent

      Күн мурун

      ****IDIOT ALERT****

  51. langwaydpful

    langwaydpful

    2 күн мурун

    Absolutely amazing! Keep it up

  52. torrace12

    torrace12

    2 күн мурун

    13:40 *the highest resolution on a film from the 60s ever?* what i mean is that the picture is sharp enough to compare to 480dp

  53. Zach Attack

    Zach Attack

    2 күн мурун

    It's disappointing I can't like this video more than once.

  54. RoMadSan RodMadSan

    RoMadSan RodMadSan

    2 күн мурун

    I read Mr. Collins abridged version of his book in Reader's Digest, in a 1974 edition, when I was young, and it is a wonderful book.

  55. Dab-a-tron

    Dab-a-tron

    2 күн мурун

    With style

  56. Zander LaMarche

    Zander LaMarche

    2 күн мурун

    Not thrusting...

  57. Fabian Herrmann

    Fabian Herrmann

    2 күн мурун

    Great presentation of the topic at hand again, but there where a few operational VTOL planes in the 1960 like the german EWR VJ 101 and Dornier Do 31, so not that surprised to see one on the lander program here.

  58. jirikivaari

    jirikivaari

    2 күн мурун

    The apollo real time thing is really cool.

  59. Jin Kuang

    Jin Kuang

    2 күн мурун

    Another reason why people suspect it is fake is because in 1960s, there were no integrated circuits. All computation was using vacuum tubes. There is no way that they could fit that many vacuum tubes into that small module to achieve the REAL TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR LIVE BROADCASTING. Once you realize it is physically impossible with 1960s technologies, you will realize the truth. Hard science won't lie.

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      Күн мурун

      @Jin Kuang Noise filtering would have been done at the ground stations. You know, the facilities with godzilla-sized satellite dishes.

    • Jin Kuang

      Jin Kuang

      Күн мурун

      @Kyle Laurent I know what I am talking about. This is just a small set of technical issues that are impossible to address in 1960s technologies.

    • Jin Kuang

      Jin Kuang

      Күн мурун

      @Atlas You have no idea what you are talking about. Noise filtering is a main operation for real time signal processing. Back in the 1960s there is a big room in TV station doing it. In fact, not until 80s do we start having broadcasting vehicles small enough to fit into a van. And that is 1980s. Think about what is in 1960s when you need to fit a life supporting system AND a broadcasting system into that landing module.

    • Kyle Laurent

      Kyle Laurent

      Күн мурун

      You have no idea what you are talking about.

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      Күн мурун

      Of course there were integrated circuits back then, lol. And they didn't need to do any digital processing. It's just live TV. Live TV has been a thing since the early 1900.

  60. Jin Kuang

    Jin Kuang

    2 күн мурун

    Landing is relatively easy. Launching the heavy life support module back up to 300 miles orbit is hard, even with 1/6 gravity. That is the real reason why people suspect the US landing and returning are fake. If you have a chance to look at the return rocket combustion video, you will conclude it was a joke.

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      21 саат мурун

      @Jin Kuang Just do the calculations yourself, if you really care that much. Blueprints are freely available to the public. I have no idea what you mean by 'technology data'.

    • Jin Kuang

      Jin Kuang

      21 саат мурун

      Do you know why so much evidence were destroyed due to "negligence"? These evidence should be the most valuable technology data and blue prints for humanity. But no ... they were accidentally destroyed. Now we can not go back to the moon! Fundamental contradiction on how technology progress. How US suddenly get to land on the moon on the first try (very disruptive in technology progressing) and how suddenly it simply disappear (very disruptive in technology progressing).

    • Jin Kuang

      Jin Kuang

      21 саат мурун

      @Atlas I have not seen one single video or documentation on the combustion fuel needed to propel this ascending module (life supporting) back to 300 miles high up in orbit. The only video I saw was that laughable shot from the "moon surface" video on the combustion capture.

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      22 саат мурун

      @Jin Kuang Rocket science doesn't work like that.

    • Jin Kuang

      Jin Kuang

      23 саат мурун

      @Atlas So it is an equivalent of 1 ton weight on earth. Shoot that up 300 miles and how much combustion material is needed?

  61. Antonín Hájek

    Antonín Hájek

    2 күн мурун

    5:55 exactly, reason why america has area 51

  62. Annie Logwood

    Annie Logwood

    2 күн мурун

    The yielding yacht expectantly guarantee because notebook electrophoretically borrow opposite a decorous creature. scared, damp jumbo

  63. Andrew Bickerdike

    Andrew Bickerdike

    2 күн мурун

    God tier science yt channel

  64. Alwayslg

    Alwayslg

    3 күн мурун

    1:45 Among us 😳😳😳 nasa=among us???!!!111 among us = space game and space = nasa🚨🚨🚨😳😳😳

  65. Doug Wilson

    Doug Wilson

    3 күн мурун

    I still love the space program with all my heart and this video just made me happy. Thanks Destin, for the feels, and the history lesson.

  66. Auaer Auraer

    Auaer Auraer

    3 күн мурун

    Is this useful in kerbal space program?

  67. CultureStress

    CultureStress

    3 күн мурун

    This video was amazing. I hate driving a U-Haul in my hometown because I'm not familiar with how it handles--I never thought that the very first man to go to the moon had to confront the most extreme version of that feeling.

  68. Ethan Bacarella

    Ethan Bacarella

    3 күн мурун

    1:45 😮

  69. Shallow Sportsmen

    Shallow Sportsmen

    3 күн мурун

    1:45 😳😳

  70. Paul Anderson

    Paul Anderson

    3 күн мурун

    Beautiful

  71. Jon Moore

    Jon Moore

    3 күн мурун

    Ottinger "I take some responsibility for not imagining that he could have been so dumb" first of all, lol, and second of all, I've had many of those moments in my career. I don't say that to make myself feel superior to anyone else but anticipating things that might go wrong, especially when it involves other people, is a serious challenge.

  72. Mora Mulford

    Mora Mulford

    3 күн мурун

    The hurt badge pivotally concentrate because monkey temporarily invent given a mysterious kiss. black-and-white, brave insulation

  73. Peter Pike

    Peter Pike

    3 күн мурун

    How to land on the moon? The same way you land on cheddar. Boo-yah!

  74. Skywalker Sound

    Skywalker Sound

    3 күн мурун

    Have you made a video about Vortex Ring State vs “Settling With Power” in helicopters and the seeming controversy about the two terms between the US definitions and international definitions? The helicopter that crashed during the Bin Laden raid sent me down that rabbit hole. It’s interesting and difficult to find specifics. Would be interesting I think.

  75. Liqtor

    Liqtor

    3 күн мурун

    Michel Collins was the loneliest man in the universe when orbiting the moon by him self. He described it as very serene and calming.

  76. Joe Bidome

    Joe Bidome

    3 күн мурун

    1:58 AMOGUS REFERENCE WHEN THE SMARTER EVERY DAY IS SUS 😳😳😳

    • Joe Bidome

      Joe Bidome

      Күн мурун

      @Jeremy Hopkins no u

    • Jeremy Hopkins

      Jeremy Hopkins

      Күн мурун

      1:45

    • Quinn

      Quinn

      3 күн мурун

      RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  77. soopahsoopah

    soopahsoopah

    3 күн мурун

    Carrying the Fire is the best-written book from the Apollo era, Collins is a superb author.

  78. P5Master

    P5Master

    3 күн мурун

    they did it in hollywood studios...EZ

    • Brad Wooldidge

      Brad Wooldidge

      Күн мурун

      Did you even *watch* the video, moron?

  79. Juan Hernandez

    Juan Hernandez

    3 күн мурун

    The dusty goldfish canonically need because seed currently own near a vast mountain. woebegone, aback distance

  80. SavedBy Grace

    SavedBy Grace

    3 күн мурун

    Seems like they could have solved their simulation problem by installing 4 smaller jets at each corner and throttle their lift to that of 5/6 the weight of the aircraft. Once they have done that, they could install the 5th main jet to move the 1/6 remaining weight and effectively have exactly what they would need on the moon. Then when they built the lunar landing craft they could do the exact same operation only to a 1/6 weight scale on the trust. Seems a lot simpler than building some giant platform crane that can in no way provide a consistent lift or 90° pull and will in no way be duplicatable on the moon.

  81. Simetje

    Simetje

    3 күн мурун

    My brain freezed every time you said Among Us...

  82. Vincent Vader

    Vincent Vader

    3 күн мурун

    According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon. Maybe bc it was a Hollywood soundstage.

    • Brad Wooldidge

      Brad Wooldidge

      Күн мурун

      We didn’t actually “lose the technology”, lol. We lost the infrastructure. Since you’re a flattard, look up what that word means.

    • Atlas

      Atlas

      Күн мурун

      We literally did though

    • Apocalips

      Apocalips

      3 күн мурун

      'According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon'. According to an idiot that means all the Apollo missions were a gigantic hoax....

  83. ronakb

    ronakb

    3 күн мурун

    okay so i dont get it if we had to simulate the moon's gravity why not try the free fall thing, just in a very controlled environment where to simulate the moon's gravity?

  84. yogi Halim

    yogi Halim

    3 күн мурун

    Mr. Wayne Ottiger I love that guy. I hope more people interviewed him, keep him company and leech off from his wonderful mind.

  85. evilsanta8585

    evilsanta8585

    3 күн мурун

    Hold up are we being pulled down to the earth or is the earth pushing up against us? Honestly you should do a video on gravity, there are couple contradicting theories

  86. Michael Stoyles

    Michael Stoyles

    3 күн мурун

    Great we’re going back to the moon hopefully start making a lunar base, but it’s cool to think nowadays there are literally hundreds of space simulators, what would take a couple months of calculating some numbers would take mins now

  87. yogi Halim

    yogi Halim

    3 күн мурун

    are these now rendered obsolete by accelerometer and gyroscope like in a quadcopter drone?

  88. yogi Halim

    yogi Halim

    3 күн мурун

    2nd question, as an alternative to the frame built by nasa for testing 1/6th of the weight, can we use hot air baloon instead?

  89. yogi Halim

    yogi Halim

    3 күн мурун

    Can't you just remove weights, change into lighter frame etc like in automobile drag race, to offset the 1/6th weight in testing?

  90. 1nf3ct3dTT

    1nf3ct3dTT

    4 күн мурун

    Is the new lunar landing not gonna be made by a computer? Like they did with the Mars Rover now. Would that not be way safer?

  91. Real HIFI Help

    Real HIFI Help

    4 күн мурун

    These guys are smart.

  92. p H

    p H

    4 күн мурун

    Sus at 1:44

  93. Connor Michalec

    Connor Michalec

    4 күн мурун

    Love this man

  94. JACOB NEAL

    JACOB NEAL

    4 күн мурун

    1:58 sus!

  95. Matt Matyas

    Matt Matyas

    4 күн мурун

    1:58 is sus

  96. that gamer that no one knows Bro

    that gamer that no one knows Bro

    4 күн мурун

    All you need to do to manually land on the moon is play video games every day for 2 hours a day for all of your astronaut training, doing that will allow you to have almost instant reflexes and will be able to click at 15 cps

  97. Michael McKinley

    Michael McKinley

    4 күн мурун

    @19:43 conventional wisdom states that the phone in my pocket has more computational power than NASA had, in its entirety when Neil Armstrong made that step.... i have reviewed the schematics, and the code, and I am going to go with it.... so now let us consider what scientists and engineers accomplished with slide rules and transistors.... Now let Us push our tools so hard, to accomplish even more....

  98. Michael McKinley

    Michael McKinley

    4 күн мурун

    Your interview with Mr. Ottinger is a national treasure... i was weeping nerd tears, when Mr. Ottinger said that engineers of his day were not better than the engineers of today... we use the tools we have, we stand on the shoulders of giants. Amen.

  99. Michael McKinley

    Michael McKinley

    4 күн мурун

    @17:00 porting the compressor to bleed off for anti torque. that, friends and neighbors, is how you get to the moon... I believe we men walked on the moon. but the landing was always a rough spot for me. i downloaded something like 30 gigs of Apollo data from the NASA technical report server. it was all rational... but the landing part was really sketchy.... until now...

  100. C A

    C A

    4 күн мурун

    Microsoft moon simulator

Кийинки